Skip to main content
HS
HiSETSuccess
LeetCode Prep

System Design

Interview framework, chapters, case studies, depth guides, and adaptive quizzes.

Design loop · not a glossary

Draw the system like the room is watching

Interview framework, estimation craft, chapter depth, full case walkthroughs, and FAQs by topic — wired into the same mastery graph as your coding track.

6

Chapters

40

Lessons

20

Case studies

83

Detailed FAQs

108

Adaptive quizzes

The 45-Minute Design Interview Framework

  1. 1

    Clarify requirements (5–8 min)

    Separate functional (features) from non-functional (latency, availability, consistency, durability). Confirm MVP vs nice-to-haves, mobile/web, auth, and geographic scope.

  2. 2

    Back-of-envelope estimation (3–5 min)

    Estimate DAU/MAU, QPS (avg + peak), storage, and bandwidth. State assumptions loudly. Round to powers of 10 — interviewers want reasoning, not precision.

  3. 3

    API & data model sketch (5 min)

    List core endpoints (REST or RPC). Define primary entities and relationships. Pick read vs write patterns before choosing SQL/NoSQL.

  4. 4

    High-level design (10 min)

    Draw clients → CDN → LB → services → cache/DB/queue. Walk through the hottest user flow end-to-end before adding boxes.

  5. 5

    Deep dives (15–20 min)

    Interviewer picks 2–3 areas: sharding, caching, fan-out, consistency, bottlenecks. Explain tradeoffs and why you chose X over Y.

  6. 6

    Wrap-up (3–5 min)

    Failure modes, monitoring/SLOs, security basics, and what breaks at 10× traffic. Mention phased rollout if time allows.

Estimation cheat sheet

1 day: 86,400 sec ≈ 10⁵ sec
1 month: ≈ 2.5M sec
1 year: ≈ 31.5M sec
DAU → QPS: DAU × actions/day ÷ 86,400; peak ≈ 2–5× avg
Storage: records × bytes/record × retention × replication
Bandwidth: QPS × payload size; watch egress cost
Latency budget: 100ms page ≈ 50ms backend; 30ms DB; 20ms network
Availability: 99.9% ≈ 8.7 hr downtime/year; 99.99% ≈ 52 min

Common pitfalls

  • Jumping to microservices before clarifying scale
  • Picking Kafka/Redis/Cassandra by name without justification
  • Ignoring read/write ratio and access patterns
  • Forgetting failure modes and single points of failure
  • No numbers — estimation anchors every decision

Study chapters

40 lessons from scalability through cloud — each links to adaptive quizzes.

Practice all quizzes (108) →

Staff-level depth

6 chapter depth packs — anti-patterns, worked numbers, interviewer traps.

Fundamentals — Staff Depth

Treat fundamentals as a decision framework, not a vocabulary quiz. Staff answers name the bottleneck resource (CPU, memory, disk, network), pick the scaling lever that attacks it, and quantify latency/throughput/availability tradeoffs before drawing boxes. Caching, CDNs, and load balancers are tools with failure modes — you score by saying when not to use them.

Data Storage — Staff Depth

Storage interviews reward modeling access patterns, not listing databases. Staff answers pick primary keys and sharding keys from query shapes, separate OLTP from analytics, and speak consistency (strong vs eventual) as a product requirement. Indexes, replication, and partitioning are capacity and correctness tools — you name the failure when the wrong key or engine is chosen.

Distributed Systems — Staff Depth

Distributed systems answers are about failure and coordination cost. Staff candidates invoke CAP/PACELC as constraints on a specific failure (network partition), design for idempotency and exactly-once effects via at-least-once + dedupe, and treat consensus, leader election, and consistent hashing as tools with operational load — not buzzwords.

Cloud Architecture — Staff Depth

Cloud design is about blast radius, tenancy, and operability — not logo bingo. Staff answers place workloads in multi-AZ (and optionally multi-region) with clear data residency, IAM least privilege, and cost/latency tradeoffs. Managed services are fine when you own failure modes: throttles, regional outages, and vendor lock-in escape hatches.

Interview Skills — Staff Depth

System design interviews score communication and judgment under time pressure. Staff candidates clarify scope, state assumptions with numbers, drive a structured agenda (requirements → estimate → HLD → deep dive → risks), and invite collaboration. Depth beats breadth: one sharp deep dive outperforms a shallow tour of every buzzword.

Building Blocks — Staff Depth

Building blocks (rate limiters, unique IDs, queues, search, notifications) are reusable patterns you compose. Staff answers know the algorithm options (token bucket vs sliding window, snowflake vs UUID), their failure modes, and how to place them in a larger design without over-fitting. Precision on APIs and data structures beats vague 'we'll use Redis'.

Design case studies

20 full walkthroughs — requirements, estimation, API, data model, architecture, deep dives, and failure modes.

Advanced — Staff-level depth

Frequently asked

System Design Q&A by topic

83 detailed answers across 8 topics.

Progress syncs with your curriculum mastery, study plan, and CS pathway dashboard.